JURIDICAL REVIEW OF MONEY LENDING AGREEMENTS DECLARED VOID BY LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58471/jms.v1i02.120Kata Kunci:
Constitution, Juridical Overview, loan agreement, blockingAbstrak
This study aims to determine whether the decision of the West Jakarta District Court Judge who decided on the Loan Agreement between Nine AM Ltd. with PT. Bangun Karya Pratama Lestari is null and void in accordance with the law of agreement or not and to find out the juridical implications of the West Jakarta District Court Decision in Case No. 451/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Bar regarding the cancellation of the loan agreement. This study uses a normative legal research type using a statute approach and a case approach. The results of this study are 1) The decision of the West Jakarta District Court is in accordance with the law of the agreement that the agreement is null and void. This is because the Loan Agreement has violated the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely the non-fulfillment of the element of a lawful cause and contrary to Article 31 of the Language Law and Article 1339 of the Civil Code which stipulates that an agreement is not only bound to what is expressly agreed. in the agreement, but also bound by propriety, custom, and law. 2) The juridical implication of the decision is that any agreement that is not made in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 of the Language Law will be declared null and void/the agreement is deemed to have never existed and the parties are returned to their original condition. Likewise, any accompanying agreement (accessoir) will also be declared null and void, even though the agreement is made in the presence of an authorized official
Unduhan
Referensi
E. A. Priyono, “Pengaruh Globalisasi Ekonomi Terhadap Perubahan Peraturan Bidang Perjanjian Di
Indonesia,” Diponegoro Priv. Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.
F. Luthfi, “Implemenetasi Yuridis tentang Kedudukan Memorandum of Understanding (mou) dalam Sistem Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia,” Syariah J. Huk. dan Pemikir., vol. 17, no. 2, 2018, doi:
18592/sy.v17i2.1971.
A. R. Sari, “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemberi Pinjaman dalam Penyelenggaraan Financial
Technology Berbasis Peer to Peer Lending di Indonesia,” 2018.
Sundhari, “PELAKSANAAN PENDAFTARAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA SECARA ELEKTRONIK (ONLINE)
,” Moral. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.
Z. ‘Ilmi, “IMPLIKASI KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DAN PEMBIAYAAN SYARIAH (KSPPS)
TERHADAP SOSIAL EKONOMI PENGUSAHA MIKRO DI KOTA SURABAYA,” EKOSIANA J.
Ekon. Syari’ah, vol. 4, no. 01, 2018, doi: 10.30957/ekosiana.v4i01.44.
D. Haspada, “Perjanjian Nominee Antara Warga Negara Asing dengan Warga Negara Indonesia
dalam Praktik Jual Beli Tanah Hak Milik yang Dihubungkan dengan Pasal 1313 Kitab
Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,” Wacana Paramarta J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 17, no. 2, 2018, doi:
32816/paramarta.v17i2.77.
S. Zein, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Aplikasi Pinjaman Dana
Berbasis Elektronik (Peer To Peer Landing / Crowfunding ) Di Indonesia,” J. Bisnis dan Akunt.
Unsurya, vol. 4, no. 2, 2019.
siti kholifah, “Tinjauan Hukum Ekonomi Islam Terhadap Transaksi Financial Technology (Fintech)
Pada Layanan Peer To Peer Lending Syariah (Studi Pada Layanan Pinjaman Online PT
Investree Radhika Jaya),” Society, vol. 2, no. 1, 2019.
E. S. Puspoayu, A. R. Hakim, and H. S. Bella, “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN
PENCEMARAN MINYAK DI WILAYAH TELUK BALIKPAPAN,” J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum, vol.
, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art7.
“TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG PERKAWINAN SEDARAH MENURUT UU NOMOR 1 TAHUN
,” LEX Priv., vol. 6, no. 2, 2018.
N. Fitriah, “Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Kriteria Pencemaran dan Perusakan Lingkungan Menurut UU
No. 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup,” Halu Oleo Law Rev., vol. 1, no.
, 2018, doi: 10.33561/holrev.v1i2.3643.
“TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KEJAHATAN HARTA BENDA MENURUT PASAL 365 KUHP
TENTANG PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN,” Tinj. YURIDIS TERHADAP KEJAHATAN
HARTA BENDA MENURUT PASAL 365 KUHP TENTANG PENCURIAN DENGAN
KEKERASAN, vol. 7, no. 3, 2018.
