Analyst of Education Quality Improvement in Humbang Hasundutan Regency through the School Literacy Movement
Kata Kunci:
School Literacy Movement; Educational Quality; Literacy Skills; Learning Process; Learning OutcomesAbstrak
This study aims to analyze the role of the School Literacy Movement (Gerakan Literasi Sekolah/GLS) in improving the quality of education in Humbang Hasundutan Regency. The study employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach using case studies at primary and junior secondary school levels, supported by descriptive quantitative data in the form of literacy pre-tests and post-tests, observations of the learning process, and school assessment results. The findings indicate that the implementation of GLS significantly improved students’ literacy skills, with an average score increase of 23.65%, particularly in interpreting textual meaning (26.68%) and drawing conclusions (25.68%). The quality of the learning process also improved, as reflected in increases in text-based learning (46.15%), discussion and reflection activities (54.17%), active student participation (44.44%), and learning motivation (42.86%). In terms of learning outcomes, students’ literacy achievement increased by an average of 24.91%, accompanied by a reduction in the proportion of students in the minimum proficiency category from 48% to 29%, as well as an increase in the intermediate and advanced categories. Nevertheless, the implementation of GLS still faces major challenges, including limited literacy resources, teachers’ workload, and weak monitoring systems. These findings demonstrate that GLS makes a tangible contribution to improving the quality of both the learning process and learning outcomes, with its effectiveness being strongly influenced by the quality of implementation and the support of the school ecosystem.
Unduhan
Referensi
Adipat, S., & Chotikapanich, R. (2022). Sustainable Development Goal 4: An Education Goal to Achieve Equitable Quality Education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(6), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0159
Asykur, M., Mirwan, M., & Halik, S. (2022). Improving Literacy Skills Through Strengthening the Quality of School-Based Education. PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v9i2.3874
Christina, R., & Vinogradova, E. (2017). Differentiation of Effect Across Systemic Literacy Programs in Rwanda, the Philippines, and Senegal. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017(155), 51–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20188
Crawford, M., Raheel, N., Korochkina, M., & Rastle, K. (2025). Inadequate foundational decoding skills constrain global literacy goals for pupils in low- and middle-income countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(January). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02028-x
Dewi, A. C., Ichsan, M. F., Munandar, I. A. Al, Laele, M. A., Hajar, N., & Mira. (2023). Literacy as a Strategy for Improving the Quality of Education. International Journal of Sustainability in Research, 1(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsr.v1i4.803
Fitri, D. A. (2022). School Literacy Movement: A Literature Review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 05(07), 2414–2418. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v5-i7-23
Fullan, M. (2020). The nature of leadership is changing. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12388
Gonzalez, Naihobe. (2018). When evidence-based literacy programs fail. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(4), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718815675
Honorato-Errázuriz, J., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2020). Innovative public policies in the development of reading skills in basic education: Regarding the systematic mapping protocol. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436575
Sancho‐zamora, R., Hernández‐perlines, F., Peña‐garcía, I., & Gutiérrez‐broncano, S. (2022). The Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020842











