Concept of Resolving State Administrative Disputes Related to Environmental Issues from the Perspective of Substantive Justice
Abstrak
The resolution of administrative disputes related to environmental issues has increasingly demonstrated responsiveness towards ensuring ecological justice. Efforts to fulfill ecological justice within the State Administrative Court (PTUN) have started to be reflected in the judges' considerations, which weigh the interests of sustainability and the balance between human and environmental interests, both in the present and in the future. This paper will explore two main issues: (1) whether the practice of resolving state administrative disputes related to environmental issues in Indonesia reflects substantive justice, and (2) how the concept of state administrative dispute resolution related to environmental issues can guarantee the achievement of substantive justice in the future. The findings of this study indicate that (1) several PTUN rulings have taken environmental justice into account as the core of their reasoning, by considering three key principles of environmental justice, such as intergenerational equity, sustainable environment, and the polluter pays principle; (2) there is a need for the internalization of environmental protection principles in state administrative disputes, similar to the position of the principles of AUPB (Administrative Principles of Good Governance) as a benchmark for assessing government actions. The internalization of environmental principles can be implemented through several steps: first, reformulating positive law by revising the PTUN Law to explicitly grant judges the authority to examine the ecological substance of cases; second, enhancing judges' capacity through environmental education; and third, shifting the legal enforcement paradigm to recognize the environment as a legal subject with rights to be protected
Unduhan
Referensi
Abdul, H. A. (2023 ). Eksistensi precautionary Principles Dalam pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Berdasarkan Hukum Agraria di Indonesia. Journal of Comprehensive Science , 1514-1520.
Afandi, F. (2023). Penggunaan Bukti Ilmiah dan Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Putusan Pidana Materil Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Tahun 2009-2020. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia , 77-120.
Aju Putrianti, A. Y. (2023 ). Green Court Towards Eco Justice . E3S Web of Conferences , (pp. 1-9).
Andang Binawan, M. G. (2024). Omplementasi Hak Atas Lingkungan Hidup yang Bersih dan Sehat Serta berkelanjutan dalam Konteks Hukum Indonesia . Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan , 126-143.
Baihaki, M. R. (2021 ). Persetujuan Lingkungan Sebagai Objectum Litis Hak Tanggung Gugat di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Telaah Kritis Pergeseran Nomenklatur Izin Lingkugan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 tahun Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Majalah Hukum Nasional , 31-51.
Bukulu, F. (2023 ). Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan dalam Amdal: Telaah Kritis Penagakan Hukum Nasional . Enviromental Protection and Management in EIA : Critical review of national law enforcement , 61-78.
Christianti, J. A. (2022 ). Penggunaann Prinsipp Intergeneration Equity dalam Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kesejahteraan Hewann di Tempat Wisata dari Kekejaman . Belli Ac Pacis , 8.
Endri. (2022 ). Asas in Dubio Pro nature dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Lingkungan Hidup . Jurnal Peratun , 117-136.
Fauzi Syam. Sukamto Satoto, H. (2023 ). Politik Hukum Pemberian Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Pengujian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang . Undang: Jurnal Hukum , 189-233.
Fisher, E. (2025). Teeling Meaningfull Stories About Climate Change and Public Law . Journal of Enviramental Law , 1-22.
Fransisca Romana harjiyatni, M. C. (2022). Studi komparatif penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Indonesia dan Thailand . Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, 371-391.
Hannah Graham, R. W. (2020 ). Green Justice . Inovative justice , 12.
Hardi, L. A. (2023 ). Enviromental Justice Advocacy Oleh Gerakan Masyarakat Cinta Alam Dalam Konflik Pembangunan Kereta Gunung RInjani. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosisologi , 131.
Hester, T. D. (2017). Green Statutory Interpretation by Enviromental Courts and Tribunals . Enviromental Law and Management , 92-96.
Hudali Mukhti, B. B. (2023). Enviromental Justice at the Enviromental Regulation in Indonesia and Uzbekistan. Journal of Human Rights , 171.
Jumas. (2024). Establishing an enviromental Court in Indonesia: Addresing Legal Chalenges For Enviromental Justice in Line with SDG 13 and SDG 16. Journal of Lifstyle and SDGD Review 5 , 23-45.
Kartikasari, M. D. (2020 ). Menelisik Akar Pemikiran Asas in Dubio Pro natura dalam penegakan Hukum . Verstek , 422-439.
Koenlius Benuf, S. M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap keamanab Data Konsumen Financial Teknologi di Indonesia. . Refleksi Huku : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum , 145-160 .
Koster, V. (2007). The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation on Decision- making and Access to Justice in Eviromental Matters (Arhus Convention) . Making Treaties Work : Human Rights, Enviromental and Arms Control , 179-217.
M. Hapsari, S. N. (2024). Publict Trust Doktrine in Indonesia: Expectation and prospect. IOP Conference Series: Earth Enviromental Science 2030 (p. 23). 2022.
M. Rahmayanti, D. E. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Terhadap Anak dan Lansian yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Ringan . Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 2, 145.
Nur Sulistiyaningsih, A. N. (2023). Implementasi Public Trust Doctrine Dalam pengambilan Kebijakan di Tingkat Daerah dan Pusat: Tantangan dan peluang di Indonesia . Jurnal Esensi Hukum , 70-86.
Sabda Ramadhani, D. Z. (2024 ). Peran Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup di Era Globalisasi . Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan , 56 .
SUMMIT, F. (1991). The Principles of Enviromental Justice . FNPCL SUMMIT , (pp. 1991-2004).
Wahyuni, S. (2021). Konsistensi Putusan Hakim Terhadap Perkara kerugian Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia . ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan , 81-102.
Wiraganti, R. W. (2024). Optimalisasi Sarana Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia . Jurnal Informasi Publik , 369-379.











