Critical Discourse Analysis of Influencer Language in Building Digital Public Opinion
Kata Kunci:
critical discourse analysis, influencers, digital public opinion, persuasive language, social mediaAbstrak
This study aims to analyze influencers' linguistic strategies in building digital public opinion through a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach. The background of this study is based on the increasing role of social media influencers as digital opinion leaders who not only convey information but also construct social reality through persuasive and ideological language practices. Although various previous studies have highlighted aspects of credibility and engagement , the linguistic dimensions and power relations in influencer discourse are still relatively understudied. This study uses a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach with Fairclough's three-dimensional model that includes text analysis, discursive practices, and social practices. The research data consists of 15 public opinion content from three social media influencers selected purposively based on the level of interaction and issue relevance. The data were analyzed through transcription, discourse segmentation, thematic coding, and critical interpretation stages to identify lexical strategies, syntactic structures, modalities, framing, and representations of social actors. The results show that influencers systematically use evaluative diction, high modality, metaphors, and polarization strategies to frame issues and build certain ideological positions. At the level of discursive practice, the use of inclusive pronouns and personal narratives strengthens the legitimacy of opinions and creates symbolic closeness with the audience. At the level of social practice, influencer discourse operates within a hybrid digital power structure—encouraging public participation while simultaneously reproducing the logic of attention commodification. This study concludes that digital public opinion is formed through structured, rather than spontaneous, discursive processes, and that influencer language plays a strategic role in the construction of social reality. Theoretically, this study expands the application of Critical Discourse Analysis to the study of digital influencers; practically, these findings contribute to strengthening society's critical literacy regarding social media discourse.
Unduhan
Referensi
et al Sinaga, Tantiarana Fiesta, “Critical Discourse Analysis of How Online News Construct Public Opinion During Campaigns,” J. English Lang. Educ., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 686–695, 2025.
et al Fan F., “How influencers’ social media posts have an influence on audience engagement among young consumers,” Young Consum. Insight Ideas Responsible Mark., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 427–444, 2023.
et al Sari, Eka Dyah Puspita, “Critical Discourse Analysis in Digital Media: Unveiling Ideology and Power in the Technological Era,” J. Am. Inst., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 371–379, 2025.
et al Jamil, Sehrish, “LANGUAGE, POWER, AND IDENTITY IN SOCIAL MEDIA: A STUDY OF LINGUISTIC STRATEGIES IN INFLUENCER CULTURE,” J. Appl. Linguist. TESOL , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 977–989, 2025.
RW Fitriyani, “Critical discourse analysis of the practical socio-cultural dimension in Instagram posts @pramonoanungw,” J. Education, Language and Literature , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 2025.
Jamshaid and Amir, “IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION OF INFLUENCERS: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE OF INSTAGRAM POSTS,” J. Appl. Linguist. TESOL , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2744–2753, 2025.
et al Shmalenko, Iuliia, “Impact of Social Media Influencers on Public Policy and Political Discourse,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanite. Res. , vol. 617, pp. 88–93, 2021.
et al Gaspersz, Rivalda, “THE ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCERS IN FORMING PUBLIC OPINION: A SYSTEMATI LITERATURE REVIEW ON A CASE STUDY IN INDONESIA,” J. BADATI Soc. Hum. , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 253–268, 2024.
MM Shah, “Manipulating Public Perception: A Critical DiscourseAnalysis of Political Headlines on Pakistani Social Media,” J. Dev. Soc. Sci. , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 554–563, 2025.
et al Ullah, Ikram, “A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE PATTERNS AND POWER DYNAMICS IN SOCIAL MEDIA DISCOURSE,” J. Appl. Linguist. TESOL, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2024.
et al Afrasiab, Muhammad, “The Language of Social Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Online Debates,” Soc. Sci. Rev. Arch., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2025.
N. Kencana, “The Impact of Online Media Discourse on Public Opinion in Regional Elections: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” Interact. J. Pendidik. Bhs., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 936–947, 2024.
et al Ngaji, Febrito Montanus, “Digital Discourse, Public Sentiment, and Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Social Media Networks on Demonstrations in Yogyakarta,” J. Cult. Anal. Soc. Chang., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1885–1896, 2025.
H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology : An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Al Akromi and Santika, “The Role of Language in Constructing Political Image on Social Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” J. Multidisiplin, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2024.











