Application of Legal Considerations for Judges with Visum Et Repertum Evidence in the Criminal Act of Preplanned Murder Analysis of Decision Number 1100/Pid.B/2024/Pn Mdn

Eman Triboi Waruwu; Yusuf Hanafi Pasaribu; Winta Hayati

Authors

Eman Triboi Waruwu Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
Yusuf Hanafi Pasaribu Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
Winta Hayati Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Evidence, Premeditated Murder, Judge's Considerations, Visum Et Repertum

Abstract

Visum Et Repertum is a written report from a doctor (expert) made under oath, regarding what was seen and found on living evidence, corpses or physical or other evidence then carried out an examination based on the best knowledge. This study aims to analyze the regulation of the position of visum et repertum as evidence in criminal cases in Indonesia, and the application of legal considerations for judges with visum et repertum evidence in premeditated murder crimes. The research method used is normative juridical with a case and legislation approach and uses various secondary data such as regulations, legislation, court decisions, legal theory doctrines and can also be in the form of opinions of scholars and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the stu dy conclude that the regulation of the position of visum et repertum as evidence in criminal cases in Indonesia is not explicitly regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. However, in Staatsblad 1937 Number 350 in article 1 it is stated that visum et repertum is a written statement made by a doctor under oath or promise about what is seen on the object being examined which has the power of evidence in criminal cases referring to article 184 paragraph (1) point c of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding written evidence. The application of legal considerations for judges with visum et repertum evidence in the crime of premeditated murder in decision Number 1100 / Pid.B / 2024 / PN Mdn, has applied legal considerations with visum et repertum evidence that has been issued by the Department of Forensic Medicine and Medicolegal Sciences, Bhayangkara Hospital TK II Medan Number: 19 / III / 2024 / RS. Bhayangkara dated March 24, 2024. The conclusion of the study confirms that judges in their decisions prioritize facts in court that are in accordance with the values of justice, certainty, and legal benefits.

References

Waruwu Noman Tuboinam, “Implementasi Asas Ultimum Remidium Terhadap Anak Sebagai Penyalahguna Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 37/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Mdn),” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Medan Area, Medan, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v5i2.1837.

WIdhy Andrian Pratama, A. Nevi Yuliani, and . M., “Penegakan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Berencana Dengan Mutilasi Dalam Persfektif Ham,” Jurnal Bela Negara, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–34, May 2024, doi: 10.70377/jbn.v2i1.7551.

R. ASTUTI, “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Konkrit Dalam Mencari Kebenaran Materiil Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana,” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 83, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.35308/jic.v5i2.3434.

Crhirto William and T. D. Wijaya, “Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Merdeka,” Dinamika Hukum & Masyarakat, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 149, May 2023, doi: 10.30737/dhm.v6i1.4665.

Gani Hamaminata, “Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia,” JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL, vol. 2, no. 4,

pp. 52–64, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i4.2334.

E. Roesnajanti, “Penerapan Azas Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI

NO. 1454 K/PID.SUS/2011 DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI LAMONGAN NO.262/PID.SUS/2017/PN LMG),” Lex Journal: Kajian

Hukum & Keadilan, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 99, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.25139/lex.v4i2.3380.

A. Alaslan, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif,” Jan. 04, 2024, Widina Media Utama, Bandung. doi: 10.31237/osf.io/smrbh.

D. A. Putri and M. Rustamaji, “Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Mengungkapkan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan,”

Verstek, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 34, May 2024, doi: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.82534.

Nasarudin Annisa Nurfadhila and Arafat Muhammad Rusli, “Peranan Dan Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak

Pidana Perkosaan,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, vol. 9 No.14, no. 14, pp. 131–142, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8171562.

D. Varesa, R. Asmara, and H. H, “Visum et repertum sebagai alat bukti dalam tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana (studi putusan nomor:214/Pid.B/2019/PN.Bna),” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 121, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.29103/jimfh.v4i3.6384.

P. E. Nafatilopa and T. Michael, “Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Umum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016,” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 342–351, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.47647/jsh.v5i2.1018.

Sanjaya Umar Haris, “Keadilan Hukum Pada Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Hak Asuh Anak,” Yuridika, vol. 30 No. 2, no. 2, p. 352, May 2015, doi: 10.20473/ydk.v30i2.4653.

Marzuki Suparman, Harijanti Susi Dwi, Shidarta, Imran, Suharto, and Kartika Dewi, “Bunga Rampai: Memotret Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim dari Berbagai Perspektif,” Hidayati Festy Rahma, Ed., Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2024, p. 5.