Policy Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paskibraka Program at the Provincial Level of DKI Jakarta
Keywords:
policy evaluation; Paskibraka Program; Pancasila ideological development; William N. Dunn; Special Capital Region of Jakarta Province.Abstract
This study was motivated by the gap between the normative design of Presidential Regulation Number 51 of 2022 and BPIP Regulation Number 3 of 2022 and the implementation of the National Flag Hoisting Troop Program (Paskibraka), including overlapping authority among selection assessors, limitations of the Transparency Application, unequal access for participants from island regions, and the suboptimal follow-up development of Purnapaskibraka Pancasila Ambassador members. The research problem addressed is how to evaluate the policy implementation of the Paskibraka Program at the provincial level in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta. This study employed a qualitative approach within a post-positivist paradigm using a case study method. The evaluation was analyzed using William N. Dunn’s (2018) six evaluation criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with nine informants selected through purposive sampling from BPIP, the provincial organizing committee, and Purnapaskibraka Pancasila Ambassadors, complemented by document studies. The data were then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014) through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that the policy has not been implemented optimally. Effectiveness was achieved only in the formation stage and the execution of flag-hoisting duties, while the four subsequent sub-programs have not yet been implemented. Efficiency has not been achieved because the budget is concentrated on the first two sub-programs, whereas the remaining three follow-up sub-programs receive no allocation. Adequacy and equity have not been fulfilled due to unequal participant access in the Administrative Regency of the Thousand Islands, while responsiveness and appropriateness have only been partially achieved. The study concludes that the policy requires revision regarding the technical regulation of the four follow-up sub-programs. It is recommended to revise Article 11 Paragraph (2) of Presidential Regulation Number 51 of 2022 and Article 21 Paragraph (2) of BPIP Regulation Number 3 of 2022, develop implementation and technical guidelines for the follow-up sub-programs, and incorporate monitoring and sustainability dimensions into the policy evaluation framework for Pancasila ideological development.
References
Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar evaluasi program pendidikan. Perdana Publishing
Anderson, J. E. (2014). Public policymaking: An introduction (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Arifin, Z. (2019). Evaluasi program: Teori dan praktik dalam konteks pendidikan dan nonpendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (rev. ed.). Rineka Cipta Coté, J. E. (2014). Youth Studies: Fundamental Issues and Debates. Palgrave Macmillan Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications
Hasbullah, & Anam, K. (2019). Evaluasi program pendidikan: Konsep dan aplikasi.
Prenadamedia
Jones, C. O. (1984). An introduction to the study of public policy (3rd ed.). Brooks/Cole. Jones. (1985). School Finance: Technique and Social Policy. London Coller Macmillan Pub.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–322). Routledge.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Ndraha, T. (2011). Ilmu Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan bahasa.
Cakra Books.
Nugroho, R. (2011). Public Policy: Dinamika Kebijakan, Analisis Kebijakan, Manajemen Kebijakan. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Nugroho, Yanuar. (2014). “Tantangan Evidence-Based Policy di Indonesia.” Jakarta: Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (AIPI).
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Rowman & Littlefield.
Rusdiana, A. (2017). Kebijakan pendidikan: Dari filosofi ke implementasi. Pustaka Setia Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Subarsono, AG., 2005, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogjakarta
Subhan, Haris. (2019). “Evidence-based Policy And Practice: Tantangan dan Pengembangan.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Wahab, A. (1990). Analisis Kebijakan Dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijakan Negara.
Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Wasistiono, S. (2013). Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 1–12.
Wibowo, A. (2013). Pendidikan karakter berbasis nilai-nilai Pancasila untuk generasi muda.
Pustaka Pelajar.
Widodo, Joko. (2008) Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta,Bayumedia
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Referensi berupa Jurnal:
Adhari, Putri A, Dewi, Dinie A. (2022). Penguatan Nilai Pancasila dalam Kehidupan pada Arus Globalisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai. Vol 6(2). 10578-10579
Nurhaidah, Musa, M.I. (2015). Dampak Pengaruh Globalisasi Bagi Kehidupan Bangsa Indonesia. Jurnal Pesona Dasar. 3(3). 10
Octavia, D. V., Nurdin, E. S., & Ruyadi, Y. (2025). Strengthening Pancasila Leadership Character through the “Desa Bahagia” System: The Case of the Paskibraka Training Programme. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research. 6(4).
parNurizki, M., Apriandari, W., & Asriyanik, A. (2023). Algoritma Naïve Bayes untuk Rekomendasi Seleksi Peserta Paskibraka Berbasis Website. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 4(4).
Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila. (2022). Peraturan BPIP Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Seleksi dan Penetapan Paskibraka. Jakarta: BPIP.
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2021). Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Provinsi DKI Jakarta Tahun 2021. BPS Provinsi DKI Jakarta. https://jakarta.bps.go.id/
Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2024). Siaran Pers Nomor 028/HM.01/VIII/2024 tentang Aturan Berhijab pada Paskibraka Putri 2024. Ombudsman RI. https://ombudsman.go.id/
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2007 tentang Pemerintahan Provinsi DKI Jakarta sebagai Ibu Kota NKRI. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2009 tentang Kepemudaan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 7 Tahun 2018 tentang Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Provinsi Daerah Khusus Jakarta. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan HAM.
Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila Kepada Generasi Muda Melalui Program Pasukan Pengibra Bendera Pusaka. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
