Geometric Morphometric Analysis in Human Craniofacial Research: Diagnostic Value and Clinical Implications – A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Gita Dwi Jiwanda Sovira Departement of Oral Biology, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Erli Sarilita Dept. Oral Biology, Universitas Padjadjaran

Keywords:

craniofacial analysis, diagnosis, geometric morphometric, imaging, treatment

Abstract

Background: Geometric morphometric analysis has become an essential quantitative approach for evaluating complex craniofacial morphology beyond traditional linear measurements. Advances in three-dimensional imaging have expanded its application in diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment in craniofacial and dental practice. However, a comprehensive synthesis of its clinical relevance remains limited. Method: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published between 2019 and 2024. Eligible studies included original research involving human subjects that applied geometric morphometric analysis to craniofacial structures with reported diagnostic or therapeutic relevance. Study selection, data extraction, and qualitative synthesis were performed independently. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings demonstrated that geometric morphometrics is widely applied in odontological analysis and orthognathic surgery. Applications in forensic and anthropological research further highlighted its utility in population and individual identification. Conclusion: Geometric morphometric analysis provides a objective framework for craniofacial diagnosis and treatment planning. Its integration with three-dimensional imaging technologies enhances diagnostic accuracy and supports data-driven clinical decision-making. Future studies should focus on protocol standardization and large-scale clinical validation to facilitate broader implementation in routine practice.

References

Fricano EE, Gremba AP, Teixeira MS, Swarts JD, Alper CM. Using Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess the Anatomy of the Eustachian Tube in Children with and without Otitis Media. Bioengineering. 2023 Oct 1;10(10).

Gaboutchian A V., Knyaz VA, Korost D V. New approach to dental morphometric research based on 3D imaging techniques. J Imaging. 2021 Sep 1;7(9).

Saglam L, Coskun O, Gayretli O. Morphological and morphometric anatomy of the lesser occipital nerve and its possible clinical relevance. Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 1;14(1).

Croquet B, Matthews H, Mertens J, Fan Y, Nauwelaers N, Mahdi S, et al. Automated landmarking for palatal shape analysis using geometric deep learning. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec 1;24(S2):144–52.

Nauwelaers N, Matthews H, Fan Y, Croquet B, Hoskens H, Mahdi S, et al. Exploring palatal and dental shape variation with 3D shape analysis and geometric deep learning. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec 1;24(S2):134–43.

Fricano EE, Gremba AP, Teixeira MS, Swarts JD, Alper CM. Using Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess the Anatomy of the Eustachian Tube in Children with and without Otitis Media. Bioengineering. 2023 Oct 1;10(10).

Sazgar T, Al-Jaf N, Norman N, Alias A. A geometric morphometric evaluation of facial hard tissue patterns. J Orthod Sci. 2022 Jan 1;11(1):24.

Abou Sleiman R, Saadé A. Effect of septal deviation on nasomaxillary shape: A geometric morphometric study. J Anat. 2021 Oct 1;239(4):788–800.

Knigge RP, McNulty KP, Oh H, Hardin AM, Leary E V., Duren DL, et al. Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021 Sep 1;160(3):430–41.

Nemec M, Schwarz L, Bertl MH, Bertl K, Gahleitner A, Mitteroecker P, et al. Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis is associated with maxillary form: a geometric morphometric analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar 1;27(3):1063–70.

White HE, Goswami A, Tucker AS. The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology. Vol. 9, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2021.

de Boer HH, Blau S, Delabarde T, Hackman L. The role of forensic anthropology in disaster victim identification (DVI): recent developments and future prospects. Vol. 4, Forensic Sciences Research. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2019. p. 303–15.

Faridah Mohd Nor A, Yaacob Latif J, Tun Razak B, Ibrahim A, Alias A, Swarhib Shafie M, et al. Application of Three Dimensional Geometric Morphometric Analysis for Sexual Dimorphism of Human Skull: A Systematic Review. Vol. 18. 2019.

Houlton TMR, Jooste N, Steyn M, Hemingway J. Visualising trends in dentition to lip mouth morphology using geometric morphometrics. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9 September).

Roussos P, Mitsea A, Halazonetis D, Sifakakis I. Craniofacial shape in patients with beta thalassaemia: a geometric morphometric analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 1;11(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Sovira, G. D. J., & Sarilita, E. (2025). Geometric Morphometric Analysis in Human Craniofacial Research: Diagnostic Value and Clinical Implications – A Systematic Review. Jurnal EduHealth, 16(04), 1860–1865. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/healt/article/view/7793