Dental and Craniofacial Anatomical Variations and Their Impact on Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Planning: A Systematic Review
Keywords:
anatomical variation, cone-beam computed tomography, craniofacial abnormalities, dental anatomy, malocclusion, orthodontics, treatment planningAbstract
Background: Dental and craniofacial anatomical variations are fundamental determinants of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Variability in tooth morphology, skeletal relationships, and alveolar bone anatomy may influence biomechanical feasibility, treatment selection, and the risk of complications. Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on dental and craniofacial anatomical variations and to evaluate their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Methods:A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published in English within the last 10 years and involving human subjects with permanent dentition were considered. Data extraction and study selection were performed independently, and findings were synthesized narratively due to methodological heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Dental anatomical variations, particularly root morphology and tooth anomalies, were associated with biomechanical limitations and increased risk of root resorption. Craniofacial skeletal variations influenced malocclusion patterns, growth assessment, and decisions between orthodontic camouflage and combined orthodontic surgical treatment. Alveolar bone anatomical variability defined the biological limits of orthodontic tooth movement and was closely linked to periodontal risk. 3D imaging techniques, especially cone-beam computed tomography, enhanced the identification of clinically relevant anatomical constraints. Conclusions: Dental, craniofacial, and alveolar anatomical variations play a critical role in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. An anatomy driven approach supported by appropriate imaging improves diagnostic accuracy, facilitates individualized treatment strategies, and reduces the risk of adverse outcomes. These findings support the integration of comprehensive anatomical assessment into precision orthodontic practice.
References
Togninalli D, Antonarakis GS, Papadopoulou AK. Relationship between craniofacial skeletal patterns and anatomic characteristics of masticatory muscles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 25, Progress in Orthodontics. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; 2024.
Hamidaddin MA. Optimal Treatment Timing in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review. Vol. 18, European Journal of Dentistry. Georg Thieme Verlag; 2024. p. 86–96.
AlRowaili AM, AlMugeiren OM, Tashkandi NE, Tawfig A. Relationship between mandibular incisor inclination and periodontal parameters among patients undergoing non-extraction orthodontic treatment: A cohort study. Medicine. 2025 Jan 1;104(44):e45724.
Gonçalves LMN, Palinkas M, Regalo IH, Gonçalves PN, de Vasconcelos PB, Matsumoto MAN, et al. Orthodontic treatment of children with anterior open bite and posterior crossbite: An analysis of the stomatognathic system. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023 Mar 1;13(2):117–24.
Alsilq MN, Youssef M. Dentoskeletal effects of aesthetic and conventional twin block appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025 Dec 1;15(1).
Al-Mozany SA, Dalci O, Almuzian M, Gonzalez C, Tarraf NE, Ali Darendeliler M. A novel method for treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 1;18(1).
Venere D, Gaudio R, Laforgia A, Stefanachi G, Tafuri S, Pettini F, et al. Correlation Between Dento-Skeletal Characteristics And Craniomandibular Disorders in Growing Children And Adolescent Orthodontic Patients: Retrospective Case-Control Study. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016;IX(4):175–84.
Thomas J, Kannan A, Kailasam V. Morphological dimension of the permanent dentition in various malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 25, BMC Oral Health. BioMed Central Ltd; 2025.
Bagheri S, Shokuhifar M, Moradinejad M, Razavi M, Hashemi Ashtiani A, Baratvand B, et al. Associations between the 3D position of the mental foramen with sagittal skeletal relationships (classes I, II, and III) and vertical facial growth patterns (normal, long, and short faces) in different ages and sexes: a retrospective cohort study of 360 CBCTs. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 1;23(1).
Nabbout F, Baron P. Orthodontics and dental anatomy: Three-dimensional scanner contribution. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Nov 1;7(6):321–8.
Alasmari WA. The morphometric anatomy and clinical importance of the radial artery. Folia Morphologica (Poland). 2021 Dec 2;80(4):839–44.
Ahuja D, Batra P, MV A, Singh AK. Orthognathic-Like Orthodontics: Management of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in an Adult Patient. Cureus. 2024 Sep 18;
Nauwelaers N, Matthews H, Fan Y, Croquet B, Hoskens H, Mahdi S, et al. Exploring palatal and dental shape variation with 3D shape analysis and geometric deep learning. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec 1;24(S2):134–43.
Pels E, Krzewski S, Łobacz M, Wawer J. The strategies of orthodontic treatment in children with growth hormone deficiency. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2025 Dec 22;
Consolaro A. Third molars and premolars extraction in conventional orthodontics and in treatments based on maxillary bone remodeling with temporary anchorage: Indications and care. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Jan 1;22(1):23–31.
Willershausen I, Ehrenfried A, Krautkremer F, Ströbel A, Seidel CL, Paulsen F, et al. Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 1;28(1).
Chen Y, Zhao B. Comparison and analysis of alveolar bone structure characteristics in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusion in the mandibular incisor region. Medicine (United States). 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40184.
White HE, Goswami A, Tucker AS. The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology. Vol. 9, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2021.
Huanca Ghislanzoni L, Lione R, Cozza P, Franchi L. Measuring 3D shape in orthodontics through geometric morphometrics. Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 1;18(1).
Qiu T, Hu C, Zhang J, Wu F, Wang H, Liu X, et al. Attention-Base deep learning for 3D craniofacial soft tissue landmark detection and diagnosis in orthodontics. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2025 Nov 29;16(1):729. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-30383-w
López DF, Orozco MF, Ochoa Gómez S, Herrera Guardiola S, Almeida LE. Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: Importance of Its Diagnosis in the Treatment and Long-Term Stability of Skeletal Class III Correction. Diagnostics. 2025 Apr 1;15(7).
Jafari-Naeimi A, Ghorbani A, Aslani F, Ashoori N. Associations between unilateral-or-bilateral palatal impactions of permanent maxillary canines with dental morphologies, root anatomies, and alveolar measurements. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep 1;15(5):911–8.
Tavares A, Crusoé-Rebello IM, Neves FS. Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(11):e1015–20.
Ghorbanyjavadpour F, Jamali K, Roayaei Ardakani M, Rakhshan V. Morphometric variations and nonmetric anatomical traits or anomalies of the primary molar teeth, plus the molars’ size thresholds for sex identification. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 1;24(1).
Knigge RP, McNulty KP, Oh H, Hardin AM, Leary E V., Duren DL, et al. Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2021 Sep 1;160(3):430–41.
Wilkinson C, Liu CYJ, Shrimpton S, Greenway E. Craniofacial identification standards: A review of reliability, reproducibility, and implementation. Vol. 359, Forensic Science International. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2024.
Paoloni V, Gastaldi G, Franchi L, De Razza FC, Cozza P. Evaluation of the morphometric covariation between palatal and craniofacial skeletal morphology in class III malocclusion growing subjects. BMC Oral Health. 2020 May 27;20(1).
Gaboutchian A V., Knyaz VA, Korost D V. New approach to dental morphometric research based on 3D imaging techniques. J Imaging. 2021 Sep 1;7(9).
Lo Giudice A, Ronsivalle V, Gastaldi G, Leonardi R. Assessment of the accuracy of imaging software for 3D rendering of the upper airway, usable in orthodontic and craniofacial clinical settings. Prog Orthod. 2022 Dec 1;23(1).
