SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF INDUSTRY 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF PRODUCTIVITY
Keywords:
Industry 4.0, Produktivity, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Industrial Technology 4.0 is designed to provide many conveniences from a transactional persepective, to be able to increase work productivity. This disruptive digital-based technology is crushing old methods and replacing them with new ones. However, the presence of this era of disruption is both an opportunity and a challenge for people's lives. This research aims to provide information about the role of using Industry 4.0. in increasing productivity, as a transformation effort towards improvement and creating opportunities to support business development. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method for journal papers published from 2016-2021. Data collection techniques with the methode of observation, interviews, and documentation. This study's results conclude that the industrial sector's most widely implemented Industri 4.0 innovation y is Artificial Intelligence (AI). This innovation is able to increase productivity, especially in the factors of improving production processes and improving customer service.
Downloads
References
H. Mohelska and M. Sokolova, “Management approaches for industry 4.0 – The organizational culture perspective,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 2225–2240, 2018, doi: 10.3846/tede.2018.6397.
Mp. PTP Polimedia and J. Srengseng Swah Jagakarsa -Jakarta, “PENDIDIKAN POLITEKNIK DI ERA DISRUPSI TEKNOLOGI DAN REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4:0,” 2020.
C. M. Galanakis, M. Rizou, T. M. S. Aldawoud, I. Ucak, and N. J. Rowan, “Innovations and technology disruptions in the food sector within the COVID-19 pandemic and post-lockdown era,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 110. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 193–200, Apr. 01, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.002.
I. Kulkov, “The role of artificial intelligence in business transformation: A case of pharmaceutical companies,” Technol Soc, vol. 66, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101629.
R. Tutik Sri Hariyati and D. Keperawatan dan Keperawatan Dasar Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan, “MENGENAL SISTEMATIC REVIEW THEORY DAN STUDI KASUS.”
N. T. Wirawan, D. Defnizal, and R. Nadia Ernes, “PEMBUATAN TEKNOLOGI ROBOTIK DALAM DUNIA MILITER SEBAGAI MEDIA PEMANTAU DAN NEGOSIASI BERBASISKAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 155–162, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v6i2.538.
P. Studi Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam and S. Tinggi Agama Islam As-Sunnah Deli Serdang, “Dampak Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Terhadap Budaya Impact of Information Technology Development and Communication on Culture Daryanto Setiawan,” SIMBOLIKA, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/simbolika
Z. Zhai, J. F. Martínez, V. Beltran, and N. L. Martínez, “Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 170. Elsevier B.V., Mar. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105256.
K. R. Vanapalli et al., “Challenges and strategies for effective plastic waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 750, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141514.
S. Khaqiqi and L. Alfansi, “Penerimaan Teknologi Virtual Reality Uuntuk Virtual Tourism Di Indonesia Dengan Metode Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” vol. 5, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.17509/ji.
A. Pestek and M. Sarvan, “Virtual reality and modern tourism,” Journal of Tourism Futures, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 245–250, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JTF-01-2020-0004.
A. Tuomi, I. P. Tussyadiah, and J. Stienmetz, “Applications and Implications of Service Robots in Hospitality,” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 232–247, May 2021, doi: 10.1177/1938965520923961.
M. Pusparani, “FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA PEGAWAI (SUATU KAJIAN STUDI LITERATUR MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA),” vol. 2, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.31933/jimt.v2i4.
