A Review Of Notary Positions: Submission Of Notary Proto-cols Aged 25 Years Or More In Medan City

Authors

  • Yosua Leo Ezra Roito Simamora Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Hasim Purba Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Suprayitno Suprayitno Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia

Keywords:

Notary, Notary Protocol, Regional Notary Supervisory Board.

Abstract

The storage of Notary Protocols that are not submitted by Notaries to the Regional Supervisory Board is not in accordance with the provisions in Article 63 paragraph (5) of the UUJN, that Notary protocols that have exceeded a period of 25 (twenty five) years or more must be submitted to the Regional Supervisory Board. This paper discussed a formulation of the problem in this study is responsibility of notaries for notary protocols that are 25 years old or more and  the application of Article 63 paragraph (5) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notaries in the process of submitting notary protocols; also  impact on notaries who do not submit notary protocols that are 25 years old or more as regulated in Article 63 paragraph (5) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notaries. This study uses an empirical legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Data were obtained from interviews with notaries in Medan City, as well as legal document studies. The analysis was conducted qualitatively with the aim of examining notary protocol issues, combining legal theory with field data, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results of the study found that notary protocols that are 25 years old or more are regulated in Article 63 paragraph (5) of the UUJN which requires notary protocols to be submitted to the MPD in accordance with the authority of the MPD in Article 70 letter e of the UUJN, where in its implementation it is carried out through an inventory mechanism, making a list of protocols and minutes of handover, but is constrained by limited storage space, damaged protocol conditions, incomplete documents and lack of coordination, so that if the notary does not submit the protocol, administrative sanctions can be imposed in accordance with Article 85 of the UUJN in the form of verbal or written warnings, temporary dismissal, honorable or dishonorable dismissal which can affect the credibility and professionalism of the notary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, Habib. Indonesian Notary Law. PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2022.

Ali, Achmad. Unveiling the Veil of Law (A Philosophical and Sociological Study).

Mount Agung Shop, Jakarta, 2016.

Apeldoorn, Van. Introduction to Legal Science. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2000.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Integrative Legal Theory: Reconstruction of Development Legal Theory and Progressive Legal Theory. Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2012.

Bungin, Burhan. Qualitative Research: Communication, Economics, Public Policy, and Other Social Sciences. Kencana, Jakarta, 2009.

Cahyadi, Antonius and Manullang, E. Fernando M. Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2014.

Darus, M. Luthfan Hadi. Notarial Law and the Responsibilities of the Notary Office.

UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2017.

Friedman, Lawrence M. American Law An Introduction. Translated by Wishnu Basuki. Tatanusa, Jakarta, 2013.

Fuady, Munir. Unlawful Acts. First Printing. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2002.

Hajar M. Models of Approach in Legal and Fiqh Research. UIN Suska Riau, Pekanbaru, 2015.

Herdiansyah, Haris. Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences. Salemba Humanika, Jakarta, 2010.

Koentjaraningrat. Introduction to Anthropology. Aksara Baru, Jakarta, 2001.

Kusuma, Mahmud. Delving into the Spirit of Progressive Law: Paradigmatic Therapy for Weak Indonesian Law. Antonylib and LSHP Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Lubis, M. Solly. Philosophy of Science and Research. CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2001.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. Legism, Legality, and Legal Certainty. Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2017.

Margono. Principles of Justice, Benefit and Legal Certainty in Judges' Decisions. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2021.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Legal Research. UI Press, Jakarta, 2010.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Indonesian Civil Procedure Law. Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2008.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Understanding the Law: An Introduction. Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2014.

Muhammad, AbdulKadir. Law and Legal Research. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.

Nachrawi, Gunawan and Agung, I Gusti Agung Ngurah. Legal Theory. CV Cendekia Press, Bandung, 2020.

Prodjodikoro, R. Wirjono. Unlawful Acts Viewed from the Perspective of Civil Law. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2000.

Purba, Hasim and Purba, Muhammad Hadyan Yunhas. Basics of Legal Knowledge. Sinar Grafika, East Jakarta, 2019.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Progressive Law Urgency and Criticism. Epistema Institute and Public Relations, Jakarta, 2011.

Rasjidi, Lili and Putra, IB Wyasa. Law as a System. Rosdakarya Youth, Bandung, 2011.

Rifa'i Abubakar. Introduction to Research Methodology. Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, 2021.

Ruslan, Rosady. Public Relations and Communication Research Methods. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Yosua Leo Ezra Roito Simamora, Hasim Purba, & Suprayitno, S. (2024). A Review Of Notary Positions: Submission Of Notary Proto-cols Aged 25 Years Or More In Medan City. Jurnal Ekonomi, 13(04), 808–824. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/5798