Influence Disclosure, Tenure Audit, Audit Judgment and Lowballing on the Accuracy of Giving Audit Opinions to Hoods in Makassar

Authors

  • Syamsuri Rahim Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesian Muslim University
  • Muslim Muslim Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesian Muslim University
  • Andi Fajri Bahnur Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Indonesian Muslim University

Keywords:

disclosure, audit tenure, audit judgment, lowballing

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of disclosure, audit tenure, audit judgment and lowballing on the accuracy of providing audit opinion in KAP in Makassar. Data in this study were obtained from each KAP in Makassar City who were willing to become respondents. This research uses primary data by conducting research directly in the field by giving questionnaires / question sheets to 41 respondents. The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that: partially, the Disclosure variable had a positive and significant effect on the Accuracy of Audit Opinion, the Tenure Audit variable had a positive and significant effect on the Accuracy of Audit Opinion, Audit Judgment Positive and significantly affected the Accuracy of Audit Opinion and Lowballing. on the Accuracy of Providing Audit Opinions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al, B. et. (2002). Why Good Accountant Do Bad Audits. Harvard Business Review. Anthusian Indra Kurniawan, H. L. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Delay. Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 4(3), 1–13.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jtidp.v4n2.2013.p165-174

Arsianto, maydica rossa, & Rahardjo, shiddiq nur. (2009). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30630.32324

Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106

Defiani. (2015). Pengaruh Gender,kompleksitas tugas, tekanan ketaatan, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap pertimbangan audit. Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen Dan Ekonomi. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Elmawati, D., & Yuyetta, E. N. A. (2014). Pengaruh reputasi Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP), audit tenure, dan disclosure terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 1–10.

Januarti, I. (2009). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Perusahaan, Kualitas Auditor dan Kepemilikan Perusahaan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern (Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting.

Kanodia, C., & Mukherji, A. (1994). Audit Pricing, Lowballing and Auditor Turnover: A Dynamic Analysis. Accounting Review.

Kurniawati, T. (2015). Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor, Disclosure, Audit Client Tenure, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property yang terdaftar di BEI Periode 2010-2014.

Margaret, A. N., & Raharja, S. (2014). Analisi Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment Pada Auditor Bpk Ri. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(1992), 1–13.

Nugroho, L., Nurrohmah, S., & Anasta, L. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal SIKAP (Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing Dan Perpajakan), 2(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v2i2.79

Permendikbud. (2016). No Title肯定・否定表現における日本語程度副詞について. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000238666

Praditaningrum. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Judgment.

Praditaningrum, A. S., & Januarti, I. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen Dan Ekonomi.

Praptitorini, M. D., & Januarti, I. (2011). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Default Dan Opinion Shopping Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2011.05

Putra, D. A., Anwar, A. S. H., & Nur, T. (2017). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v6i1.5081

Rahim, S. (2017). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Kualitas Audit dan Opinion Shopping Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2016.v11.i02.p02

Rahim, S., Ahmad, H., Nurwakia, N., Nurfadila, N., & Muslim, M. (2020). The Influence of Audit Staff Quality and Client Type on Audit Evidence Collection with Communication Type as Moderation. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 3(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v3i1.79

Rahman, A., & Siregar, B. (2012). Faktor - Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi.

Shafie, et al. (2009). Audit Firm Tenure and Auditor Reporting Quality. Malaysia.

Singgih, B. (2010). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Professional Care Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Siregar, S. R. (2012). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pertimbangan Opini Auditor Atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 2 (1), 1-15 https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v1i2.554

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif. bandung.

Sukrisno, A. (1996). Auditing (Penunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Akuntan Publik) (keempat; salemba empat, ed.). jakarta. https://penerbitsalemba.com/buku/01-0371-auditing-petunjuk-praktis

sunyoto. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Ekonomi (cetakan pe). yogyakarta.

Suputra, K. Y. W. dan I. D. G. D. (2017). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Etika Profesi, Komitmen Profesional Auditor, Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Pemberian Opini. ISSN: 2302-8556 E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana Vol.18.1. Januari (2017): 88-116, 18, 88–116. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v6i1.5081

Verdiana, K. A., & Utama, I. M. K. (2013). Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor , Disclosure , Audit Client Tenure Pada Kemungkinan Pengungkapan Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana.

Yanti, E. F., Yulianti, Y., & Amilin, A. (2016). PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE DAN LOWBALLING TERHADAP PEMBERIAN OPINI AUDIT. Akuntabilitas. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v7i2.2676

Zaila, Y. (2013). Pengaruh Etika, Profesionlisme, dan Pengalaman Audit Terhadap ketepatan pemberian Opini Audit Aukuntan Publik. Jurnal UIN Syarif Hidayatullah..

Downloads

Published

2023-11-22

How to Cite

Syamsuri Rahim, Muslim Muslim, & Andi Fajri Bahnur. (2023). Influence Disclosure, Tenure Audit, Audit Judgment and Lowballing on the Accuracy of Giving Audit Opinions to Hoods in Makassar. Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika Dan Sains, 13(03), 691–702. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/InfoSains/article/view/3324