Analysis of Differences in Delivery Outcomes of Cesarean Section Eracs Method with Conventional Methods at Hanau Hospital

Greta Selfani Gulo; Masdalina Pane; Mido Ester J. Sitorus; Donal Nababan; Heny Syapitri

Authors

Greta Selfani Gulo Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
Masdalina Pane Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
Mido Ester J. Sitorus Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
Donal Nababan Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
Heny Syapitri Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia

Keywords:

Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Section, Conventional methods, Hospitalization postoperative pain level, recovery time after cesarean section, Postoperative complications

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the difference in delivery outcomes between the Cesarean Section method with the Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Section (ERACS) approach and the conventional method at Hanau Hospital. The ERACS method is applied to improve patient recovery after cesarean section by optimizing pain management, early mobilization, and fluid management. This study used a retrospective design on data of patients undergoing Cesarean Section at Hanau Hospital during a certain period. The data collected involved variables such as duration of hospitalization, postoperative pain level, recovery time after cesarean section, and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests and chi-square tests, were used to evaluate significant differences between ERACS and conventional method groups. The results of this study are expected to provide a better understanding of the effectiveness of the ERACS method in improving labor outcomes, especially related to recovery time, pain levels, and incidence of complications. These findings may support clinical decision-making regarding the selection of optimal cesarean section methods at Hanau Regional Hospital and may provide guidance for similar health institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corso, E., Hind, D., Beever, D., Fuller, G., Wilson, M.J., Wrench, I.J., Chambers, D., 2017. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17, 1–10.

Culyer, A.J., Chalkidou, K., 2019. Value Heal. 22.

Cunningham, F.G., Leveno, K.J., Bloom, S.L., Spong, C.Y., Dashe, J.S., Hoffman, B.L., Casey, B.M., Sheffield, J.S., 2022. Williams Obstetrics 26th Edition, williams Obstetric 24th Edition.

Darwish, A., Mustafa, M., Youness, E., Al-Harazi, B., 2022. Open J. Nurs. 12, 831–841.

Gedefaw, G., Demis, A., Alemnew, B., Wondmieneh, A., Getie, A., Waltengus, F., 2020. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf. Surg.

Gee, M.E., Dempsey, A., Myers, J.E., 2020. Caesarean section: techniques and complications. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Med.

He, Y., Liu, C., Han, Y., Huang, Y., Zhou, J., Xie, Q., 2021. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 1–8.

Hedderson, M., Lee, D., Hunt, E., Lee, K., Xu, F., Mustille, A., Galin, J., Campbell, C., Quesenberry, C., Reyes, V., Huang, M., Nicol, B., Paulson, S., Liu, V., 2019. Obstet. Gynecol. 134, 511–519.

Hidayati, A., Mu’ti, A., Nur, M.I., 2022. J. Verdure 4, 194–205.

Jaata, J., 2021. Coping Community Publ. Nurs. 9, 107.

Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2018. Riskesdas 2018, Laporan Nasional Riskesndas 2018.

Lama, M., Rawat, H., Aryani, F.N., Nurwahyuni, A., 2022. J. Lentera 5, 9–14.

McCoy, J.A., Gutman, S., Hamm, R.F., Srinivas, S.K., 2021. Am. J. Perinatol. 38, 1341–1347.

Meng, X., Chen, K., Yang, C., Li, H., Wang, X., 2021. Front. Med. 8.

Notoatmodjo, S., 2015. Perilaku Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Prokopowicz, A., Korzeniewska, A., Byrka, K., 2021. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 303, 391–399.

Pujić, B., Vejnović, T., Jovanović, L., Andjelić, N., Vejnović, A., Palmer, C., 2022. Acta Clin. Croat. 61, 151–154.

Ratnasari, F., Warmiyanti, 2022. J. Ilm. Indones. 2, 821–829.

Roofthooft, E., Joshi, G.P., Rawal, N., Van de Velde, M., Joshi, G.P., Pogatzki-Zahn, E., Van de Velde, M., Schug, S., Kehlet, H., Bonnet, F., Rawal, N., Delbos, A., Lavand’homme, P., Beloeil, H., Raeder, J., Sauter, A., Albrecht, E., Lirk, P., Lobo, D., Freys, S., 2021. Anaesthesia 76.

Tamang, T., Wangchuk, T., Zangmo, C., Wangmo, T., Tshomo, K., 2021. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 1–7.

Tika, T.T., Sidharti, L., Himayani, R., Rahmayani, F., 2022. J. Bagus 02, 402–406.

Voon, H.Y., Shafie, A.A., Bujang, M.A., Suharjono, H.N., 2018. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 44.